<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remarkable Birds: 100 of the World&#8217;s Most Notable Birds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/books/misc/remarkable_birds.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/books/misc/remarkable_birds.htm</link>
	<description>Book Reviews for Birders, and More...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCreary</title>
		<link>http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/books/misc/remarkable_birds.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCreary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/books/misc/remarkable_birds.htm#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>Here is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/supplemental/remarkable-birds-the-top-100.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;complete list&lt;/a&gt;.

It looks like only 1 of the 5 groups you mentioned are represented. The author did state that he tried to limit it to no more than 2 representatives from any given family or group. He kept to it for the most part, except for the raptors and shorebirds. And having 2 of the world&#039;s 15 cranes included may be a bit much. But cranes are amazing, so I can&#039;t fault that too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the <a href="http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/supplemental/remarkable-birds-the-top-100.htm">complete list</a>.</p>
<p>It looks like only 1 of the 5 groups you mentioned are represented. The author did state that he tried to limit it to no more than 2 representatives from any given family or group. He kept to it for the most part, except for the raptors and shorebirds. And having 2 of the world&#8217;s 15 cranes included may be a bit much. But cranes are amazing, so I can&#8217;t fault that too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Furrer</title>
		<link>http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/books/misc/remarkable_birds.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Furrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/books/misc/remarkable_birds.htm#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>Would you list the 100 species, please? Just curious. To me, it is more bird groups that I would want to see. Like at least one representative of the pittas, woodswallows, fairy-wrens, nandus, seed snipes etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you list the 100 species, please? Just curious. To me, it is more bird groups that I would want to see. Like at least one representative of the pittas, woodswallows, fairy-wrens, nandus, seed snipes etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

