<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Living Bird</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/periodicals/living_bird.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/periodicals/living_bird.htm</link>
	<description>Book Reviews for Birders, and More...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant McCreary</title>
		<link>http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/periodicals/living_bird.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant McCreary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/birders_library/reviews/periodicals/periodical-review#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only been a member for less than 2 years, so I&#039;m not aware of the change you mentioned. I&#039;m curious about it - when did it happen? Did they just completely reimagine/retarget the publication?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only been a member for less than 2 years, so I&#8217;m not aware of the change you mentioned. I&#8217;m curious about it &#8211; when did it happen? Did they just completely reimagine/retarget the publication?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John L. Trapp</title>
		<link>http://www.birderslibrary.com/reviews/periodicals/living_bird.htm/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>John L. Trapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/birders_library/reviews/periodicals/periodical-review#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I may be showing my age, but I much preferred the original Living Bird, published annually and stuffed with scientific literature.  The stuff that appears in Living Bird today is just pretty pictures and fluff articles for the masses.  The cynical might see it as little more than a PR tool for recruiting membership in the CLO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be showing my age, but I much preferred the original Living Bird, published annually and stuffed with scientific literature.  The stuff that appears in Living Bird today is just pretty pictures and fluff articles for the masses.  The cynical might see it as little more than a PR tool for recruiting membership in the CLO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

